Oped by Jessica Jackson
Originally Published at thehill.com


 

In his recent State of the Union address, President Trump reaffirmed that restoring law and order remains a central priority for this administration. That commitment must be measured not just by rhetoric, but by results.

For years, our country has had the wrong debate about crime. We have been told that we have to choose between being tough and being smart, between accountability and second chances, between law and order and reform. But that is a false choice. 

I have spent my career working with law enforcement, victims, families and people coming home from prison. What I have learned is simple: The safest communities focus on what actually reduces crime. The First Step Act was grounded in that reality.

The Safer Supervision Act builds on it. Together, they represent a results-driven approach that aligns with President Trump’s agenda to restore law and order in this country.

When Trump signed the First Step Act, he did something that had not happened in a generation. He brought together conservative lawmakers, law enforcement leaders and community voices to focus on outcomes instead of ideology. As the White House recently emphasized, restoring law and order means protecting communities, reducing victimization and holding people accountable in ways that actually prevent future crime.

The First Step Act was designed to do exactly that. It focused on risk, incentives and evidence. It expanded programming that helps people change their behavior while ensuring that individuals who pose a real threat remain closely supervised.

The Safer Supervision Act is the natural next step in that strategy. It applies the same principles to the federal supervision system, which remains outdated and inefficient. Today, probation and supervised release often function in ways that do not improve public safety. Officers are overwhelmed by paperwork and low-risk cases, while too much time is spent on responses to technical violations that do little to protect the public. It all distracts from people who need more support or who may pose a greater risk, and it creates a revolving door that frustrates law enforcement and destabilizes families.

The Safer Supervision Act refocuses the system on accountability and results.

It prioritizes supervision resources for people who need more support or who may pose a greater risk, while creating meaningful incentives for compliance and stability. It allows officers to spend more time on individuals who are struggling and less time on those who are doing the right thing. This is not about weakening supervision. It is about making supervision stronger and more effective.

The recent debate over the First Step Act only reinforces why this next phase of reform is so important. A recent opinion piece published by The Hill raises concerns about implementation, oversight, and whether the system is focusing enough on public safety. Those are legitimate questions. The Safer Supervision Act directly addresses these concerns by increasing accountability and ensuring that supervision resources are targeted where they matter most. It reflects the same conservative principles that shaped the First Step Act in the first place.

There is also a broader public safety benefit that is often overlooked. Stable employment, family connection and community support are some of the strongest predictors of long-term success. In our organization’s work, we have seen firsthand that when people on supervision get jobs and build stability, crime drops. Employers gain reliable workers, families gain stability, and neighborhoods become stronger. The Safer Supervision Act expands these opportunities while maintaining accountability.

Trump proved that a smart-on-crime approach leads to greater public safety when he signed the First Step Act. He showed that Republicans can lead on public safety while delivering real results. Recidivism has declined since its passage, demonstrating that these reforms, when implemented correctly, prevent repeat crime. The Safer Supervision Act continues that legacy by applying the same data-driven, outcome-focused approach to federal supervision. 

If we are serious about restoring law and order, we cannot rely on outdated systems that waste resources and fail to prevent repeat crime. We need policies that are grounded in evidence, supported by law enforcement, and focused on results. 

The First Step Act was a historic step in that direction. The Safer Supervision Act is the next one. Together, they represent a clear, consistent path forward. Law and order is not about slogans. It is about outcomes. These reforms deliver both.

Jessica Jackson is the CEO of REFORM Alliance.